
Case Study 01
Apartment Building
Apartment building, 24 residential units, built in 1974, housing company, Bavaria
Residential
Services
- ·Energy cost analysis
- ·Heating replacement
- ·Funding application handling
Starting point
The oil heating system, installed in 1997, was close to failing. The building’s energy consumption was around 35% above the benchmark for comparable properties, yet it was unclear which measure would have the greatest impact. The housing company faced a fundamental decision: simply replace the system or optimise it systematically? Requirements under the German Buildings Energy Act (GEG) and ESG reporting obligations added to the pressure to act.
Challenge
The building had no hydraulic balancing and poorly insulated distribution pipes. Because of the high flow temperatures, a heat pump could not be shown to be economically viable without an analysis of the existing system. The owner needed a basis for decisions that brought together system choice, cost-effectiveness and funding strategy – not three separate expert reports.
What BLuEngineering did
- ·Complete energy cost analysis: consumption data, load profiles, existing plant, heating curve evaluation
- ·Heat load calculation to DIN EN 12831
- ·Comparison of options: gas condensing boiler, hybrid system (heat pump + gas), brine-to-water heat pump
- ·Cost-effectiveness calculation including funding for each option
- ·Decision: hybrid system with air-to-water heat pump + gas condensing boiler to cover peak loads
- ·Funding-optimised engineering design, BEG EM application (federal funding for individual measures), tendering and contract award management
- ·Site supervision, support with hydraulic balancing + commissioning
- ·Operational optimisation in the first year of operation
Results
- 31%
- lower heating costs – every year, permanently
- 100%
- of BEG EM funding applied for and paid out in full
- 5.8 yrs
- payback period including funding
What made the difference
The decision in favour of the hybrid system rather than a heat pump alone only emerged from the heat load calculation: the flow temperatures were too high for economically viable heat-pump-only operation. Without this analysis, the system choice would have been either wrong or more expensive.

